My questions for former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld (suggested on the comments section of Piers Morgan Tonight's Facebook posting for the interview):
1. Why did the Bush administration continue to press the idea that Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction when the Chief UN Weapons Inspector Hans Blix continued to show and rightly express that Hussein had no such weapons (and when the administration itself knew it had no substantive proof, only its [incorrect] gut feeling)?
2. What vision does he have for the United States and how did he work toward achieving that vision during his time within the Bush administration? How has he worked toward it since his (forced) resignation from the administration?
3. Does he see no threat toward American civil liberties in the security theater he helped establish?
4. What is the point of "saving" our civil liberties (our "freedoms") if we must give them up for an indeterminate future? How did Al-Qaeda threaten our civil liberties, with exception of the freedom of live?
No comments:
Post a Comment